Low blood flow in back of brain increases risk of recurrent stroke
Patients who have had a stroke in the back of the brain are at greater risk of having another within two years if blood flow to the region is diminished, according to results of a multicenter study led by researchers at the University of Illinois at Chicago. These stroke patients are the most likely to benefit from risky intervention to unblock arteries, and they can be identified using a new MRI-based technology developed at UIC. The findings are published in the journal JAMA Neurology.
The vertebrobasilar region in the back of the brain is responsible for locomotion and balance. Vertebrobasilar strokes can be devastating, causing partial or total paralysis. They account for 30 percent to 40 percent of all strokes, or about 200,000 cases per year in the U.S.
Stroke patients found to have narrowing of the blood vessels in the back of the brain caused by atherosclerosis can have angioplasty, a procedure to open blocked arteries, but the procedure carries its own risks. And because blockages don’t always correlate to locally reduced blood flow – thought to be the real culprit in raising stroke risk – researchers wanted to better understand the relationship between arterial blockages, blood flow, and recurrent strokes.
“Having a blockage present in a blood vessel doesn’t always correlate to low blood flow,” says Dr. Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, professor of neurological surgery at the UIC College of Medicine and principal investigator on the study. “There can be a blockage and flow can be normal, if other nearby blood vessels are able to compensate.”
She and her colleagues wanted to try to identify which stroke patients are at highest risk for further strokes and so might benefit from angioplasty despite the risks of the procedure.
They followed 72 adult patients who had a stroke or temporary symptoms of a stroke, known as a transient ischemic attack, in the back of the brain and who also had at least 50 percent blockage of the arteries in that part of the brain. The patients were followed for an average of 22 months at five academic medical centers as they continued receiving standard care for their condition from their neurologists.
Participants were evaluated for reduced blood flow in the back of the brain using NOVA, or Noninvasive Optimal Vessel Analysis, a software program that can quantify the volume, velocity, and direction of blood flowing through any major vessel in the brain using standard MRI equipment. The NOVA software was developed at UIC by Dr. Fady Charbel, professor and head of neurological surgery, who is a co-author of the new study.
One-fourth of the study participants were found to have diminished blood flow in the back of the brain, which turned out to be a significant predictor of subsequent stroke. These patients had 12- and 24-month stroke-free survival rates of 78 percent and 70 percent, respectively, compared to 96 percent and 87 percent for patients with normal blood flow.
“At one year, the risk for patients with low blood flow was about five times as high as risk for patients without low flow in the back of the brain,” Hanjani said. For these patients, the benefits of angioplasty probably outweigh the risks.
“About three-quarters of patients didn’t have low blood flow in the vertebrobasilar region – other arteries are doing the job of ensuring that proper blood flow is reaching that area – and these patients would not benefit from treatments aimed at opening the vessels, such as angioplasty – in fact, the procedure would put these patients at unnecessary risk,” Hanjani said.
The ultimate goal is to find what treatments might be most effective for each patient, Hanjani said.
The UIC Office of Technology Management helped to transfer the NOVA technology to a startup. VasSol, Inc. further developed the technology into a product with an improved user interface, adding functionality and applicability.
Hanjani and her colleagues hope that the ease of identifying the high-risk group using NOVA will enable further study of the condition and the evaluation of new therapies to further reduce the risk of recurrent stroke.
The study sites that enrolled patients were UIC; Washington University of St. Louis; the University of California, Los Angeles; Columbia University in New York; and the University of Toronto/Toronto Western Hospital.
Other co-authors on the JAMA Neurology paper are Dr. Dilip Pandey, Dr. Xinjian Du, DeJuran Richardson, Dr. Keith Thulborn, Dr. Victor Aletich and Linda Rose-Finnell of UIC; Dr. Mitch Elkind of Columbia University; Dr. Greg Zipfel and Dr. Colin Derdeyn of Washington University; Dr. David Liebeskind of UCLA; Dr. Frank Silver of the University of Toronto; Dr. Scott Kasner of the University of Pennsylvania; Dr. Louis Caplan of Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital and Harvard Medical School; and Dr. Philip Gorelick of Michigan State University.
The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (grant R01 NS 059745). Additional funding was provided by the Dr. Ralph and Marian Falk Research Trust Foundation. Material research support was provided by VasSol, Inc.